Why Did the Squirrel Cross the Road?

In cities the number and types of predators drastically differ from nearby rural and “natural” areas. This often means that the biggest threat prey species have to face in cities are domestic predators (dogs and cats) or generalist “mesopredators” like raccoons, coyotes, or foxes. That is, unless you consider the threat from humans, and in particular the cars they drive.

Car collisions are a significant cause of mortality for just about any species that lives near roads. Take, for example, the infamous roadkill highway in Florida (US highway 441). Researchers documented roadkill on a 3.2km stretch of highway over the course of a year: 1,821 vertebrate carcasses from 62 species! Unfortunately this is just one of many examples of extremely high road mortality. This study came to mind recently as I was driving in rural Massachusetts and witnessed a massive roadkill mortality event unfold over the course of several weeks. More squirrels than I have ever seen, dead on the road over the span of ~20km. In one stretch there were more than 30 dead animals over only 1 mile of road! Which got me wondering…

Why did the squirrels cross the road?

A Bostonian squirrel thinks twice before crossing a busy street.

Or, more specifically, why was I witnessing such a slaughter in rural areas but not on the streets of Boston?

My first thought was that maybe the speed of cars was the answer. Maybe in the city cars drove slower than on rural highways and so it was less likely that squirrels would be hit? But I saw plenty of dead squirrels on rural residential roads as well, so that didn’t seem to be a great explanation.

My next thought was that maybe there were more squirrels in the rural areas. Probably true, as abundance of species frequently declines as urbanization increases in intensity along a gradient. And certainly, the distribution of squirrels in Boston is a lot more clustered, restricted to parks and patches of green-space, compared to the rural areas. But I have personally (and regularly) documented over 150 squirrels within a single park in Boston (the Public Garden), and they are extremely abundant in the Fenway Emerald Necklace parks. It seems that I should see at least one roadkill squirrel around these areas.

Which left me with the explanation that perhaps the squirrels in urban areas are simply not crossing the roads. Road avoidance behavior is common in many species that naturally are wary of fragmenting elements of the habitat, leading to population isolation. But this inherent avoidance of roads clearly isn’t occurring in squirrels, as they showed little inhibition to road crossing in rural areas (in fact, I watched in horror several times as squirrels attempted to run the 4 lane highway gauntlet… which did not end well for most). Of course, there could be a far simpler explanation: street cleaning may remove the roadkill in more urban areas before we observe them.

Behavioral adaptation to avoid roads, however, is an intriguing hypothesis and one that has been proposed for other urban species. Is it possible that urban squirrels have learned to avoid roads because of the danger they pose? If so, is this a learned behavior culturally transmitted or does it arise from natural selection on exploratory behaviors, perhaps? What physical changes have occurred in urban squirrel brains associated with this behavioral shift? This intriguing possibility raises so many potential questions just begging to be studied!

One thought on “Why Did the Squirrel Cross the Road?

Add yours

  1. I’m glad someone else spends as much time as I do watching squirrels try to cross the road 🙂 The number of times I have been in my car and slammed on the breaks because of one dashing…yikes! Which makes me want to anecdotally add one other explanation: co-evolution! What if it’s the case that humans in urban areas are more cognizant of the urban wildlife around them, and are more “cautious”? This is not to say that “city-goers” value wildlife more than individuals in non-urban areas, but maybe (just maybe) humans in urban areas “break” more for squirrels (and hopefully wildlife in general) in urban areas compared to non-urban areas? I don’t know about you but I watch children in awe of a squirrel in our urban parks understanding their value and rarity at a young age, whereas in non-urban areas, it’s almost as if some individuals “swerve” towards the squirrels as if they are a dime-a-dozen. Good example of the social and cultural variation that we need to understand when studying urban evolution.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: